When she meets Viktor, she’s upfront about the fact that she’s a mess emotionally, but she’s very quick to blame men for her troubles.Īmelia is a very one-dimensional character. Much like Tucci’s promotion, Amelia’s only bit of characterization comes in the form of her romantic tryst with a married man. Their romantic subplot plays out in a formulaic and one-note path. Catherine Zeta-Jones plays Amelia, a flight attendant who takes a shine to Viktor. That’s not the only area where The Terminal failed to take off. Instead, the character simply feels like a manufactured antagonist for Viktor and the result is a really clunky narrative. Even worse is that he was warned about the vetting process in the beginning of the movie. But it’s far too much of a stretch to think someone who’s willing to go to such lengths wouldn’t stop to consider how the people vetting him would see his actions toward Viktor. Dixon isn’t given a reason or purpose for being hotheaded, except for the impending promotion. This anachronistic behavior makes Stanley Tucci’s character needlessly villainous and difficult to take seriously. Earlier in the movie, Dixon pulls guards away from an exit (in post-9/11 JFK) specifically so Viktor will leave. When Viktor realizes he can get quarters by retrieving carts, Dixon’s response is to hire a person to retrieve carts in an effort to “starve Viktor” off of the premises. Yet, he needlessly breaks protocol and acts with inhumane malice in his efforts to brush Viktor off his hands. The movie presents his motivations for covering up Viktor as being guided by his desire for the promotion. Tucci’s storyline doesn’t ring true for me at all. When Viktor Navorski arrives, Dixon goes to great lengths to sweep him under the rug and pawn him off onto other agencies. He’s told early in the movie that he is going to be under heavy scrutiny as his bosses vet him for his new position. Stanley Tucci plays Frank Dixon, a Customs agent on the cusp of a big promotion. There are, however, several problems with The Terminal. Nevertheless, Hanks gives a touching and believable performance here. Tom Hanks sells Viktor and his journey well through a performance that could have been severely hampered by the story’s reliance on Viktor’s inability to communicate. The Terminal is packaged as a feel-good movie about a man so lost in translation that he can’t comprehend it when the tough guy customs agent ( Stanley Tucci) is giving him a way out of his predicament. government can’t recognize his country, Viktor is relegated to the International Lounge terminal of JFK until Customs can figure out what to do with him. In 2004’s The Terminal Tom Hanks plays Viktor Navorski, an Eastern European immigrant whose plane lands in New York City shortly after his home country of Krakozhia undergoes a coup. You can find all the reviews here, follow me on Twitter here and check out The Obsessive Viewer Podcast here. Then I’ll compare the two and give a summary at the end. So for each of these posts, I will write a present-day review and then copy/paste the original review after. Recently, I dug up these reviews and decided to revisit each movie and evaluate how my tastes have changed over the last decade. Over the summer of 2004, 17/18 year old Matt wrote 21 movie reviews and posted them on IMDb. I had my first job at my local movie theater and used my newfound disposable income to get a Netflix subscription.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |